K C Autos

Reviews

• Delighted with Service!

  Our car was away for repair for two weeks, following damage to the wing mirror, quarterlight & door on driver's side. Our car was returned as promised looking like new - it had even been valeted! Thank you so much.

  10

  Marie-anne N.
  Review Date: 02/05/2011 Report review
• Bad service and after care is none existant

  This garage is totally useless, 7 weeks to fix my car then they tell me that the fault that they caused is down to me becase " it says on the internet that these cars suffer with this fault". receptionists in this garage are unfriendly and again useless, DO NOT USE THIS GARAGE OR ANY OF ITS SISTER BODY SHOPS LIKE THE ONE IN NORTHWICH AS THEY ARE ALL THE SAME, LIARS, UNINTERESTED IN FIXING THE CAR BUT MORE INTERESTED IN GETTING THEIR STUPID POXY C2 BACK. CRAP

  30

  Paul M.
  Review Date: 11/08/2010 Report review
• Accident damage and bad service

  This garage is one of Esures recommended garages. They took my car in to have body damage repaired. It took 6weeks to be delivered back. On receipt of the vehicle back I found it had an engine problem. They had delivered it back with this fault which i found strange as no one had taken the time to ring me first and inform me of the problem. They sent a trailor to pick it up for investigation on my insistance as I was afraid it may cause further damage to the engine. A fiat dealer put it down to wear and tear in the absense of any other damage, a sort of catch all situation. I was promised delivery for nearly 3 weeks before they initially returned it. I would not recommend the use of this garage to anyone as since they were told by a fiat dealer that it was probably wear and tear their attitude to actually making contact with me changed. Once they knew they were in the clear they chased me for the return of the hire car. Esure also refused to let me use the uninsured loss legal part of my insurance to seek advice on the matter. Both parties did their best to stitch me up once they had it in writing that the part had just failed while in their possession.

  10

  Peter J.
  Review Date: 10/12/2004 Report review